project reality header
Go Back   Project Reality Forums > PR:BF2 Mod Forums > PR:BF2 General Discussion
PR Time:
Register Forum RulesDeveloper Blogs Project Reality Members List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality BF2 modification.

Contact Support Team Frequently Asked Questions Register today!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-17-2009, 11:58 PM   #11
nick20404

nick20404's Avatar
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

Unless you are flying like a noob or landing you have no excuse to be killed by a 50 cal in a chopper.

Btw all aircraft have light if any Armour so a 50cal would do major damage.

If you are gonna complain about unrealistic things complain about the fact you can hit a chopper with an RPG and it will keep on flying.
nick20404 is offline Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 12:04 AM   #12
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Rudd's Avatar
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

Quote:
And there's the problem that PR can't simulate the times when one lucky bullet hits a critical part, or the other times when a chopper might get riddled with bullets but still be able to fly. You have to have some form of average damage that a chopper can take.
If I'm not mistaken, you can make hitting certain bits cause more damage, like a tank (front, side, rear)

Why not make the tail section, rear rotor, and engine areas cause loads of damage, but the rest not? If they fire at the main body rather than these vulnerable points they could kill the crew, so not only does it introduce skill, increase helo survivability, it also brings in a new tactical choice for the 50cal gunner.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure."
I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys.
Rudd is offline Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 12:24 AM   #13
R.J.Travis
Supporting Member

R.J.Travis's Avatar
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

you could add a slow turret the way they are you can follow moving targets way to well if you made the 50cal turret heavy and slow would help alot.

Twisted Helix: Yep you were the one tester that was of ultimate value.
R.J.Travis is offline Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 12:27 AM   #14
Hoboknighter
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

Well, the Blackhawks should be able to take mor than 25 rounds from a .50 cal considering how armored it is; The thing was built with armor in mind. AK fire shouldn't reall damage the Blackhawks anyways, except for chipping away over maybe several clips.

The little Birds and other helo's are a different story. Those things really should be downed that quickly considering how small they are.
Hoboknighter is offline Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 01:26 AM   #15
waldo_ii
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoboknighter View Post
Well, the Blackhawks should be able to take mor than 25 rounds from a .50 cal considering how armored it is; The thing was built with armor in mind. AK fire shouldn't reall damage the Blackhawks anyways, except for chipping away over maybe several clips.

The little Birds and other helo's are a different story. Those things really should be downed that quickly considering how small they are.
Blackhawks were not built to be armored. They were built to keep the crew and passengers safe in the event of a crash. There is a difference. It was built to absorb the impact against the terrain by transferring the force throughout the wreck. It was also designed not to twist or bend. It has a strong frame, protecting the crew and passengers.

The lightweight skin was not built to stop heavy projectiles traveling at one kilometer per second with 19,000 joules of energy. Nor was the engine. Or fuel tank.

|TGXV| Waldo_II


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
waldo_ii is offline Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 01:53 AM   #16
charliegrs

charliegrs's Avatar
Send a message via AIM to charliegrs Send a message via Yahoo to charliegrs
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoboknighter View Post
Well, the Blackhawks should be able to take mor than 25 rounds from a .50 cal considering how armored it is; The thing was built with armor in mind. AK fire shouldn't reall damage the Blackhawks anyways, except for chipping away over maybe several clips.

The little Birds and other helo's are a different story. Those things really should be downed that quickly considering how small they are.
um how do you know how many rounds a blackhawk can withstand?

known in-game as BOOMSNAPP
'
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
charliegrs is offline Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 02:01 AM   #17
Solid Knight
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

Quote:
Originally Posted by charliegrs View Post
um how do you know how many rounds a blackhawk can withstand?
A BlackHawk can withstand an infinite number of hits from a .50 cal should the rounds all hit the same exact spot in the door.
Solid Knight is offline
Last edited by Solid Knight; 03-18-2009 at 02:07 AM..
Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 02:08 AM   #18
Rudd
Retired PR Developer
Supporting Member

Rudd's Avatar
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Solid Knight View Post
A BlackHawk can withstand an infinite number of hits from a .50 cal should the rounds all hit the same exact spot.
well...what if the fuel/engine was hit?

Guys, I really do suggest if you are going to comment on how well armoured/not armoured the helos are IRL you back it up with some links or personal experience.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

"You the people have the power to make life free and beautiful, to make this life a wonderful adventure."
I'm AFK until further notice, have fun guys.
Rudd is offline Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 02:19 AM   #19
Solid Knight
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr2B Rudd View Post
well...what if the fuel/engine was hit?

Guys, I really do suggest if you are going to comment on how well armoured/not armoured the helos are IRL you back it up with some links or personal experience.
I thought of that and went back and changed it. Though you don't need experience to know that if none of the rounds hit anything important that it will stay in flight.
Solid Knight is offline Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2009, 03:58 AM   #20
Spaz
Supporting Member

Spaz's Avatar
Default Re: .50 cal vs helo's

I talked to a Lynx pilot we all know and he said that a .50 will take down a heli in seconds.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Spaz is offline Reply With Quote
Reply


Tags
cal, helo
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:34 PM.


Powered by: vBulletin. ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO.
All Content Copyright ©2004 - 2012, Project Reality.