|
PR Time:
|
||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality BF2 modification. |
| View Poll Results: Should the head shots kill | |||
| Yes |
   
|
414 | 93.24% |
| No |
  
|
30 | 6.76% |
| Voters: 444. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-04-2009, 01:13 PM
|
#91 | |
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
 United States of AmericaLocation: Northern VA, USA
Posts: 208
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
Quote:
Which completely baffles me to no end..... do you DEV's actually intend on keeping this in? 94% disapproval and you can't even comment on it? Good thing I barely play video games anymore....this new "rule" is a total deal-breaker for me in this game... I don't like playing Project-Revive.... Hey DEV's..... I've got a few questions for you... read it out loud to really see how stupid this new change is... "Should you die if your Humvee is hit by an HE tank shell?" DEV- Of course you should die "Should you die if you slam your aircraft into a building at top speed?" DEV- Of course you should die "What if you bail out of your aircraft and fall like 300 feet, should you die then?" DEV - Yes, you should die then as well. "Well, should you die if you are shot in the head?" DEV- Well.....no....not really, I mean...kinda? You'll be lying on the ground for 3 minutes....but you can be revived....if you haz teh TEAMWORKZZZZZ!!!!!!111!! Seriously....WTF? | |
|
Last edited by random pants; 03-04-2009 at 01:22 PM..
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:21 PM
|
#92 |
Join Date: Jul 2007
 FinlandLocation: Lovisa
Posts: 264
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
Well then don't play it man, simple as.
For the record 1 shot critically wounded is the most realistic idea so far, and death if one takes a hit to the head. Some small caliber differences aswell. |
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:23 PM
|
#93 | |
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
 SpainLocation: Spain
Posts: 3,744
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
Quote:
| |
|
"And in the PR world ALL nations signed the treaty, now there " "Today's forecast calls for 30mm HE rain with a slight chance of hellfires" To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. oh, they're fire and forget all right...they're fired then they forget where the target is
|
||
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:28 PM
|
#94 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
FinlandLocation: Lovisa
Posts: 264
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
I'm sorry, I'll rephrase that. Don't rant buddy it's annoying and makes you look foolish, not litterally but you know.
|
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:29 PM
|
#95 | ||
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
United States of AmericaLocation: Northern VA, USA
Posts: 208
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
Quote:
Dude, nobody wants that stupid idea of every rifle critically wounding in 1 torso shot.... Even the super-realism crazies understand that the game would be broken IMMEDIATELY 5.56 weapons would DOMINATE, lone-wolfing pros like me would be able to absolutely rape again like back in .6.... Just stop with the 1-torso shot proposal... it really is a horrible idea, and you guys who support it obviously don't have any clue as to how much it would break this game. Quote:
Really don't care what you think, it's the internetz... "buddy" And your idea of a 1-shot torso gameplay is the most foolish thing in this thread by far. Edit: User was warned for piss poor attitude. | ||
|
|
Last edited by [R-MOD]Saobh; 03-05-2009 at 06:35 AM..
|
|
Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:30 PM
|
#96 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
FinlandLocation: Lovisa
Posts: 264
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
Quote:
I would choose it over headshot shooting anyday though. Well there is a point why most modern armies use the 5.56mm, and if you would have read this thread you would see that there are pretty good assymetrical balances. | |
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:33 PM
|
#97 |
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
 United KingdomLocation: norfolk
Posts: 5,965
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
i agree with random pants (WTF??) 1 shot torso hits for all weapons would suck. its good as it is now (g3 power, recoil .... m16 rate of fire low recoil) though the threads not about that.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:35 PM
|
#98 | |
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
FinlandLocation: Lovisa
Posts: 264
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
Quote:
I do think it would be the more realistic option. Over taking a bullet 5.56 or 7.62 and be able to run away full speed or just spraying the shooter with full auto (CQB) | |
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:39 PM
|
#99 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
United States of AmericaLocation: Northern VA, USA
Posts: 208
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
Quote:
Dude....JUST DROP IT... Make a new thread if you want for your "great idea"....  This thread is about the new headshot rule, and the tidal wave of suck that washed in with it.... | |
|
|
|
03-04-2009, 01:41 PM
|
#100 | |
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
United KingdomLocation: norfolk
Posts: 5,965
|
Re: Should the Head shots kill ?
Quote:
| |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
||
|
|
|
Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
|
|
| Tags |
| head, kill, shots |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
