|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 | |
![]() Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,596
Location: Viking Stronghold.
|
Quote:
| |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,175
Location: Cologne Germany
|
Well where to put Russia ? Historically they pretty much kept out of wars, unless attacked. Hitler helped Stalin kill off some more Russians, then there is Afghanistan, thats about it, no ? Maybe we should reconsider too many factions. Now you want to add the Germans too ? If one has a favourite faction, like the brits or the Americans, then there might be only like 2 maps on the server where he gets to play as said faction.
To the guy above and the quoted guy, history fail. The had the warsaw pact. If you are talking post cold war I dont think they have anything on that line. Chechens showed how overvalued Russian military is, at least when it comes to fighting like a big modern army without having WWII style casualities. Right now Putin feels kind of cornered with many former pact countries joining NATO (should be NATO+ at that point) and other countries who would like to join but are not allowed to to keep Russia good. |
|
|TG|cap_Kilgore
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() |
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ACRE Tester To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 802
Location: Istanbul
|
There was a 18 page discussion about it on PRT,which you'll see Russian is not on the same side with the NATO.
Dont want to bring subject here but latest war against Georgia(was a NATO candidate) was one of the main reasons to stop NATO "agression" against Russia(n) (hinterland),again UK bomber intercepter crisis,the other missile crisis in East Europe,Independence of Kosowo and Russian reaction + Shanghai Cooperation organistion. Shanghai Cooperation Organisation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia about the 18 page discussion Faction - Project Reality Tournament Forums |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 313
Location: Memphis, Tennesee
|
Well the Russians probably would not side with the Chinese because of some sh&@ that was stird up in the 70's. So I think everyone the the Russians!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 248
Location: New Hampshire
|
Yes, but it was the 70's. Russia was a part of the USSR. Things have changed. In the 70's people were paranoid about the Red Chinese overrunning the USA. The Cold War was still on. The British had bomber planes, Vietnam was always in the news, Jimi Hendrix was alive. Point being this is not the 70's, this is the 21st Century, things are a little different.
|
|
"I'm not crazy, I'm the only one who's not crazy!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,175
Location: Cologne Germany
|
The policy with Russia right now is to sit out a leadership still trapped in the cold war and wait for modern leaders. Putin was important, to keep Russia toegether, but I do not see what he, through the President, can do for Russias future.
|
|
|TG|cap_Kilgore
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| russia, side |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|