|
|||||||
| Register | Forum Rules | Developer Blogs | Project Reality | Members List | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| PR:BF2 General Discussion General discussion of the Project Reality: BF2 modification. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Banned
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,378
Location: Riga, Latvia| Northern Europe
|
I really enjoy this release(especially INS mode and the deviation: PEW PEW).
Almost everything is perfect for me. The downside, though, is the lack of the BMP-3's on maps such as Muttrah, Jabal.(Not a big, though, I rarely play any other mode besides INS) For example Jabal: USMC get 4 LAV's at the start, MEC get a crappy BDRM-2, although, 4 BTR-60 spawns after 10 minutes. BUT, LAV's have a lot more firepower. Of course MEC's have Rifleman AT kits and H-AT,but... USMC have those, too. I have only tested Jabal at the moment, but I think the situation is quite the same on Muttrah. I would to know your opinion on this subject. Should MEC's get a BMP-3, how would the BMP-3 unfluent gameplay etc. P.S. Please no suggestions, this is not the place for them Thank you DEV's, testers and all the people who helped to improve PR- the best mod out there! |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 8
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
|
Well a BMP-3M's Armour is light enough to not be able to withstand the LAV-25 25mm cannon and has a smaller troop capacity if i am not mistaken, but makes up for it with its increase in fire power and stability as well as off road performance. So if MEC got one on top of the BTR-60 and BRDM-2 with their 14.5mm HMG it would be fair in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 68
|
Not to take a stance on wether to implement more BMP's or not, the BTR-60 is actually far from lacking in firepower. We've tested it pretty extensively, and in a straight up firefight, the BTR knocks out the LAV with ease. While the latter might do more damage initially, its cannon overheats quickly and stays inoperable long enough for the slowest BTR gunner to pound it out with the 14,5mm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 881
Location: Norway
|
Give back the BTR90
|
|
Live by the sword, die by the sword...
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Ingame:G-LockCobra To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,173
Location: California
|
The BMP-3 would be overkill against the LAV.
|
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. You miss 100% of the shots you don't take.- Wayne Gretzky |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 219
Location: Moscow
|
BMP-3 will oneshot LAV with its main cannon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() |
Way I see it:
BMP 3 = Bradley BTR ~ LAV BDRM ~ Stryker It seems fair enough IMO. (~ stands for approximately equal to) |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
|
|
Originally Posted by whatshisname55:
"Ah yes, that link to your hard drive is working perfectly." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,600
Location: You can't get here from there
|
60, of course.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Retired PR Developer
![]() |
played jabal twice as MEC, BTR-60 sucks against LAV, you need nearly 100-150 hits from KPVT to frontal armor of LAV to kill it if it was fully repaired, another example nearly 40 hits to back and its still alive
imo, US should have less LAV's |
|
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. [R-DEV]Z-trooper: you damn russian bear spy ;P - WWJND? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| bmp3, lack |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|