Why commander can't build anti-tank gun?

Eublefar · 06-28-2008, 11:56 AM

Why commander can't build anti-tank gun?I have had many cases when tank or APC attacked bunker.It takes much time to take AT kit and engage it.At most of cases tank won't come so close that he can be engaged by AT.After this you have to hope that tank or aviation will get there in time

Harrod200 · 06-28-2008, 11:59 AM

Well, deployable AT has often been suggested, and to my mind the main problem that has been raised is balance.

Without stationary AT, armour on maps with little AT or opposing armour are very powerful. When deployable AT is added to the equation, armour becomes a death trap.

I would definitely like to see some form of deployable AT, less powerful than the TOW but more powerful than LAT, but the question is what would it be?

Eublefar · 06-28-2008, 12:08 PM

no i mean AT gun like it is.its still using by the USA forces. it will be interesting if guns can be moved by trucks

AnRK · 06-28-2008, 12:35 PM

People still use anti-tank guns? Thought it was all missiles and arty that ground pounders used to take out tanks nowadays...

cplgangster · 06-28-2008, 12:56 PM

thats what i thought, i havnt seen a mobile AT being driven round by a truck for a long while.

Sabre_tooth_tigger · 06-28-2008, 02:05 PM

Give militia 1 zis-3 for every 4 bunkers they assemble

06-28-2008, 11:56 AM	#1
Eublefar Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 26	Why commander can't build anti-tank gun? Why commander can't build anti-tank gun?I have had many cases when tank or APC attacked bunker.It takes much time to take AT kit and engage it.At most of cases tank won't come so close that he can be engaged by AT.After this you have to hope that tank or aviation will get there in time
Eublefar Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 26

06-28-2008, 11:59 AM	#2
Harrod200 Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 3,066 United Kingdom Location: Blighty	Re: Why commander can't build anti-tank gun? Well, deployable AT has often been suggested, and to my mind the main problem that has been raised is balance. Without stationary AT, armour on maps with little AT or opposing armour are very powerful. When deployable AT is added to the equation, armour becomes a death trap. I would definitely like to see some form of deployable AT, less powerful than the TOW but more powerful than LAT, but the question is what would it be?
	The original gun freak gaymer geek *To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.*

06-28-2008, 12:08 PM	#3
Eublefar Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 26	Re: Why commander can't build anti-tank gun? no i mean AT gun like it is.its still using by the USA forces. it will be interesting if guns can be moved by trucks
Eublefar Join Date: Feb 2008 Posts: 26

06-28-2008, 12:35 PM	#4
AnRK Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 2,125 United Kingdom Location: Yooooorkshire!	Re: Why commander can't build anti-tank gun? People still use anti-tank guns? Thought it was all missiles and arty that ground pounders used to take out tanks nowadays...

06-28-2008, 12:56 PM	#5
cplgangster Join Date: Jul 2007 Posts: 1,169 United Kingdom Location: london	Re: Why commander can't build anti-tank gun? thats what i thought, i havnt seen a mobile AT being driven round by a truck for a long while.

06-28-2008, 02:05 PM	#6
Sabre_tooth_tigger Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 1,837 Mozambique	Re: Why commander can't build anti-tank gun? Give militia 1 zis-3 for every 4 bunkers they assemble
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links