BMP-3 Weaponry - Page 4

General Dragosh · 02-07-2008, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dragonfire43560

Actually its more like a tank honestly. Its got a 100 mm cannon so it is essentially a very versatile tank.

A super mini tank with capable transport a all sort of armament ! and amphibious !

Who agrees ???

And for those who want technical detail...

Longbow* · 02-07-2008, 09:16 PM

77SiCaRiO77

yeah, BMP=IFV, BTR=APC

BloodBane611 · 02-07-2008, 11:15 PM

Quote:

think he means in real life BloodBane; different weapons interfering with others.

That's still not correct.

Anyhow, I disagree that the DEVs dislike asymmetrical balancing, since the BMP-3 is already contributing to the asymmetrical balance on Al Kufrah. The only difference this would make would be giving it the actual ability to kill a tank in a reasonable number of shots.

hx.bjoffe · 02-08-2008, 07:24 AM

With a designated engineer, i've gone up against MBTs several times.
The Trojka front vs Challenger ass and the tank is no more, if only taken by surprise. It will easily take two shots to the front.
I think it's silly that the Warrior is so underpowered, head on the Trojka'll hardly start smoking due to the difference in ROF. Matter of fact, any of PRs APCs will pwn the Warrior. Do the UK really produce such crappy machinery IRL?

This is my very favourite IFV(/APC) in game. I'd like to see some proper weaponry to counter inf with, though.

"Amen to asymmetrical balancing."?
Indeed.

Ragni<RangersPL> · 02-08-2008, 07:54 AM

Asymmetrical balancing is already in PR, and that's how this mod should look like IMO. That's why I like this mod so much, no more vanillish style of gameplay where both teams have thier equipment working in the same way but with different names.

77SiCaRiO77 · 02-09-2008, 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ragni<RangersPL>

no more vanillish style of gameplay where both teams have thier equipment working in the same way but with different names.

Ha! yoi should be kidding me , have you ever fighted a m1a2 with a t90 ? and viseversa? its always the saME .

02-08-2008, 07:24 AM	#34
hx.bjoffe Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,073 Norway	With a designated engineer, i've gone up against MBTs several times. The Trojka front vs Challenger ass and the tank is no more, if only taken by surprise. It will easily take two shots to the front. I think it's silly that the Warrior is so underpowered, head on the Trojka'll hardly start smoking due to the difference in ROF. Matter of fact, any of PRs APCs will pwn the Warrior. Do the UK really produce such crappy machinery IRL? This is my very favourite IFV(/APC) in game. I'd like to see some proper weaponry to counter inf with, though. "Amen to asymmetrical balancing."? Indeed.
hx.bjoffe Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 1,073 Norway
	Last edited by hx.bjoffe; 02-08-2008 at 07:34 AM..

02-08-2008, 07:54 AM	#35
Ragni<RangersPL> Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,316 Poland Location: The 44 Islands ;)	Asymmetrical balancing is already in PR, and that's how this mod should look like IMO. That's why I like this mod so much, no more vanillish style of gameplay where both teams have thier equipment working in the same way but with different names.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. RANGERS LEAD THE WAY!!! To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Do not post stupid suggestions just because you had a bad round in PR To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Last edited by Ragni<RangersPL>; 02-08-2008 at 08:03 AM..

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

02-07-2008, 09:16 PM	#32
Longbow* Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 472 Ukraine Location: Odessa	77SiCaRiO77 yeah, BMP=IFV, BTR=APC

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links