Any plans for arty coming back? - Page 3

*spacecadett* · 01-10-2008, 11:19 AM

sounds good baba, but this pulls more people of the front line(32 players a side aint enough

)and are you willing to code, animate, model and skin all this?

Nickbond592 · 01-10-2008, 03:26 PM

if the Arty isn't as hardcoded as everyone implies, maybe a smoke barrage for cover?

Tannhauser · 01-11-2008, 01:43 AM

Actually never seen a team organized enough to make a smoke barage with the LAV/BTR to cover infantry movement. But then, arti would motivate its use somehow.
Maybe not vehicles, but placeable artilery assets by CO that can be manned?

Nibbit · 01-11-2008, 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenniZ-NL

I would love a mortar class.

Ye, serious, a mortar team would b nice, and I think it fits the PR style as well

DenniZ-NL · 01-11-2008, 04:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tannhauser

Actually never seen a team organized enough to make a smoke barage with the LAV/BTR to cover infantry movement. But then, arti would motivate its use somehow.
Maybe not vehicles, but placeable artilery assets by CO that can be manned?

You mean mortars right?

[T]Terranova7 · 01-11-2008, 06:05 AM

I'm not for the player controlled artillery. Reason being is that with a limit of 32 players per team, and maps becoming ever larger, games are spread too thin to have any more players in a support role.

I'd love to see some form of Commander controlled artillery. Some sort of light barrage that could be used every 20 to 30 minutes. Even better might be to have a variety of rounds available, such as HE (High Explosive), White Phosphorus, Smoke.

Scarlet_Pimp · 01-11-2008, 06:37 AM

I wouldn't mind seeing some squad leader controlled light artillery, just a small mortar barrage, maybe have a heavy artillery barrage controlled by the commander.

joselucca · 01-11-2008, 09:48 AM

mortars would be the cats meow.

DenniZ-NL · 01-11-2008, 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by joselucca

mortars would be the cats meow.

Devs please give us mortars!!!

kristofer · 01-11-2008, 10:42 AM

The mortar suggestion has been around for aaaaages. It would just be plain confusing for it to not be put in with so much demand.

01-10-2008, 11:19 AM	#21
spacecadett Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 341 Finland Location: Finland	sounds good baba, but this pulls more people of the front line(32 players a side aint enough )and are you willing to code, animate, model and skin all this?
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

01-10-2008, 03:26 PM	#22
Nickbond592 Retired PR Developer Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 2,726 United Kingdom Location: Wales	if the Arty isn't as hardcoded as everyone implies, maybe a smoke barrage for cover?
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Smeg: Fuzz commands a lot and promotes good teamwork, db flips vehicles, Bosco is an all-round nub, Outlawz is an SP whore, Nickbond is a friggin ninja and Rhino gets kicked for being a n00b.

01-11-2008, 06:05 AM	#26
[T]Terranova7 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,073	I'm not for the player controlled artillery. Reason being is that with a limit of 32 players per team, and maps becoming ever larger, games are spread too thin to have any more players in a support role. I'd love to see some form of Commander controlled artillery. Some sort of light barrage that could be used every 20 to 30 minutes. Even better might be to have a variety of rounds available, such as HE (High Explosive), White Phosphorus, Smoke.
[T]Terranova7 Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,073	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. Member of To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. \| To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

01-11-2008, 06:37 AM	#27
Scarlet_Pimp Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 83	I wouldn't mind seeing some squad leader controlled light artillery, just a small mortar barrage, maybe have a heavy artillery barrage controlled by the commander.
Scarlet_Pimp Join Date: Feb 2007 Posts: 83	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

01-11-2008, 09:48 AM	#28
joselucca Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 123 Location: new jersey	mortars would be the cats meow. Attached Thumbnails

01-11-2008, 01:43 AM	#23
Tannhauser Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 1,213 Canada Location: Québec, Montréal	Actually never seen a team organized enough to make a smoke barage with the LAV/BTR to cover infantry movement. But then, arti would motivate its use somehow. Maybe not vehicles, but placeable artilery assets by CO that can be manned?

01-11-2008, 10:42 AM	#30
kristofer Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 137	The mortar suggestion has been around for aaaaages. It would just be plain confusing for it to not be put in with so much demand.
kristofer Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 137	"Bad area round 'ere boy, a lotta bad types, a lotta mean people... a lotta nutters." To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. : sleep is too tireing

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links