co-op missions - Page 2

~~Waaah_Wah~~ · 11-01-2007, 04:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markonymous

I for one would like to have some co-op missions in PR. like a campaign where the US army or British army or whatever Attacks an insurgent stronghold to place a bomb in some room for some reason. this would only allow 5-10 ppl to play together on the same mission but i think it would be fun. What do the rest of u think?

Played to much CS havent we?

markonymous · 11-01-2007, 05:18 PM

I actually don't play cs at all it was a fast example to explain what i meant. did u understand it?(if u did u see my point)

zardez · 11-01-2007, 09:21 PM

yeah, i didn't mean have bots (to clarify my last post) but rather be online. i think if you make it more than one objective you will find nubs doing them in the wrong order, or people waiting by the next unprotected objective. i think just a clear cut 'defend' or 'attack' this building is the way to go, for example, insurgents are in an abandoned shopping center, USMC or British forces must get into the building (wouldn't be easy) then destroy something in one of the top rooms. of course this is just an idea so that people can understand what sort of map or co-op im thinking of

markonymous · 11-02-2007, 04:27 AM

insurgents should outnumber attackers but have less and worse gear.

zardez · 11-02-2007, 04:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markonymous

insurgents should outnumber attackers but have less and worse gear.

yeah for sure, they should have 20% more people but have weapons with no optics, US forces have no explosive kits.

US can attack from any angle of the building, its a multilevel building at least 3 stories and the objective spawns on top level, bottom floor is fairly open but once your in its an open area to cover.

I like our ideas mark

markonymous · 11-02-2007, 07:20 AM

hehe ye me too

~~Waaah_Wah~~ · 11-02-2007, 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by markonymous

I actually don't play cs at all it was a fast example to explain what i meant. did u understand it?(if u did u see my point)

Well in CS you have a bunch of ppl (5-10) on each team trying to set up a bomb in a building for some reason. And the CT team has to stop them. Do you really want this in PR?

Morgan · 11-02-2007, 12:52 PM

It's what I see as CS and maybe GR:AW crossed in some hybrid idea onto the BF2 engine... Pointless IMO, just go play CS.

markonymous · 11-02-2007, 03:02 PM

well the thing is cs sux

Morgan · 11-02-2007, 07:35 PM

It's not that bad a game, it's okay for a 20 minutes of run and gun fun but it does lack a bit of depth... Still the suggestion is in itself CS.

11-01-2007, 05:18 PM	#12
markonymous Join Date: Oct 2007 Sweden Location: Göteborg, Sweden Posts: 1,490	I actually don't play cs at all it was a fast example to explain what i meant. did u understand it?(if u did u see my point)
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
	Last edited by markonymous; 11-01-2007 at 06:11 PM..

11-01-2007, 09:21 PM	#13
zardez Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 128	yeah, i didn't mean have bots (to clarify my last post) but rather be online. i think if you make it more than one objective you will find nubs doing them in the wrong order, or people waiting by the next unprotected objective. i think just a clear cut 'defend' or 'attack' this building is the way to go, for example, insurgents are in an abandoned shopping center, USMC or British forces must get into the building (wouldn't be easy) then destroy something in one of the top rooms. of course this is just an idea so that people can understand what sort of map or co-op im thinking of
zardez Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 128

11-02-2007, 04:27 AM	#14
markonymous Join Date: Oct 2007 Sweden Location: Göteborg, Sweden Posts: 1,490	insurgents should outnumber attackers but have less and worse gear.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-02-2007, 07:20 AM	#16
markonymous Join Date: Oct 2007 Sweden Location: Göteborg, Sweden Posts: 1,490	hehe ye me too
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-02-2007, 12:52 PM	#18
Morgan Join Date: Aug 2007 United Kingdom Posts: 944	It's what I see as CS and maybe GR:AW crossed in some hybrid idea onto the BF2 engine... Pointless IMO, just go play CS.
Morgan Join Date: Aug 2007 United Kingdom Posts: 944	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-02-2007, 03:02 PM	#19
markonymous Join Date: Oct 2007 Sweden Location: Göteborg, Sweden Posts: 1,490	well the thing is cs sux
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

11-02-2007, 07:35 PM	#20
Morgan Join Date: Aug 2007 United Kingdom Posts: 944	It's not that bad a game, it's okay for a 20 minutes of run and gun fun but it does lack a bit of depth... Still the suggestion is in itself CS.
Morgan Join Date: Aug 2007 United Kingdom Posts: 944	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links