why is noone playing extraction! - Page 3

MadTommy · 07-13-2007, 05:18 AM

I haven’t played xtract on beta 0.6 yet.. but i've heard its a bit buggy and messed up in the beta. Xtract is a great game mode and i really have my figures crossed for the full version of 0.6 and xtract.

Will it be possible or is it now possible to have ASS, Insurgency and xtract on the same server in the same rotation. As that is what i'd like to see.. variance.

Danthesandman · 07-13-2007, 06:22 AM

maybe the problem is that Xtraction doesnt get enough acknowledgment. maybe some more hype about it. one of the main problems i find with Xtraction is there isnt enough options or routs. on Al Basrah if they dont go through the city their gonna go through the desert. maybe if they ever make a very large of forrest or city they just give it a random Xtraction point so it will be a little different each time. couldnt be hard. i mean look at PR 0.6

IF CHUCK NORRIS WAS A DEV AND MET THE PR TEAM HE WOULD BE SAYING "IM NOT WORTHY"

Deer · 07-13-2007, 07:52 AM

many routes ? well i designed one map for extraction before R-Con, but its a bit unrealistic(and therefore wasnt put into the game), tho it could be fixed. Could remove all unrealistic stuff and edit etc etc. Tho there is loads of bridges, not realistic but thats kinda the point of map, having lots of routes which mostly can be destroyed and/or repaired.

jackal22 · 07-13-2007, 11:56 AM

that map would be pretty fun i have to admit. i like how there are lots of cps, it makes a change from the usual 5-6

i used to love extraction on bashrah on 0.4 & 0.5 though, as insurgent i used to 9/10 times blow the vip jeep thing and i came up with some sneaky ambushes, also rpged my first black hawk on the map.

problem is the auto default selection is on conquest. maybe if you could get all games to show up under the 1 tab then it would be better.

Outlawz7 · 07-13-2007, 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jackal22

that map would be pretty fun i have to admit. i like how there are lots of cps, it makes a change from the usual 5-6

Meh, Devs wouldnt like it, its too much CPs even for me, and RPs wouldnt really work on that map due the size, would probably be a big light jeep racing map, even if you remove all the unneccesseary CPs..

Deer · 07-13-2007, 01:02 PM

Aye many of the flags would be removed for conquest game mode but the map is designed for extraction not for conquest. So that MEC is spawning randomly around the map, they can blow up some bridges to reduce USMC routes to bring the VIP into safe, and USMC can clear some bridge area and repair the bridge. Also USMC would get few helicopters together with humwee/vip car convoy.

That was the idea

07-13-2007, 05:18 AM	#21
MadTommy Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,141 United Kingdom	I haven’t played xtract on beta 0.6 yet.. but i've heard its a bit buggy and messed up in the beta. Xtract is a great game mode and i really have my figures crossed for the full version of 0.6 and xtract. Will it be possible or is it now possible to have ASS, Insurgency and xtract on the same server in the same rotation. As that is what i'd like to see.. variance.
MadTommy Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 2,141 United Kingdom

07-13-2007, 06:22 AM	#22
Danthesandman Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 85 Australia	maybe the problem is that Xtraction doesnt get enough acknowledgment. maybe some more hype about it. one of the main problems i find with Xtraction is there isnt enough options or routs. on Al Basrah if they dont go through the city their gonna go through the desert. maybe if they ever make a very large of forrest or city they just give it a random Xtraction point so it will be a little different each time. couldnt be hard. i mean look at PR 0.6 IF CHUCK NORRIS WAS A DEV AND MET THE PR TEAM HE WOULD BE SAYING "IM NOT WORTHY"
Danthesandman Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 85 Australia

07-13-2007, 07:52 AM	#23
Deer Retired PR Developer Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,600 Finland Location: Lahti	many routes ? well i designed one map for extraction before R-Con, but its a bit unrealistic(and therefore wasnt put into the game), tho it could be fixed. Could remove all unrealistic stuff and edit etc etc. Tho there is loads of bridges, not realistic but thats kinda the point of map, having lots of routes which mostly can be destroyed and/or repaired.

	Last edited by Deer; 07-13-2007 at 07:58 AM..

07-13-2007, 11:56 AM	#24
jackal22 Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 851 United Kingdom Location: London!!!	that map would be pretty fun i have to admit. i like how there are lots of cps, it makes a change from the usual 5-6 i used to love extraction on bashrah on 0.4 & 0.5 though, as insurgent i used to 9/10 times blow the vip jeep thing and i came up with some sneaky ambushes, also rpged my first black hawk on the map. problem is the auto default selection is on conquest. maybe if you could get all games to show up under the 1 tab then it would be better.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-13-2007, 01:02 PM	#26
Deer Retired PR Developer Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,600 Finland Location: Lahti	Aye many of the flags would be removed for conquest game mode but the map is designed for extraction not for conquest. So that MEC is spawning randomly around the map, they can blow up some bridges to reduce USMC routes to bring the VIP into safe, and USMC can clear some bridge area and repair the bridge. Also USMC would get few helicopters together with humwee/vip car convoy. That was the idea

Sponsored Links

Sponsored Links