[Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 64/16

[R-DEV]Rudd · 08-08-2011, 11:19 PM

Al basrah 32 has got an increased view distance to make choppers more practical

We worried that the clients may have FPS troubles due to previous issues with Al Basrah.

Please vote in the poll to give us a clear indication of how the different layers affected you.

Any additional information can be posted below, any off topic posts will be extremely unwelcome.

Thanks for your cooperation.

Jolly · 08-09-2011, 12:31 AM

I have average FPS 45~50 in 32 al basrah as a infantry,i dont see any differences between 64 al basrah and i am using my laptop with NVIDIA G102M OPSYS Windows7,But the FPS will be 20 when i am driving a APC with smoke around...(thermal on)
In a word no trouble running this map.
But in Reality China Community,very few of them met Game Crash and low FPS,I'll post their report later.
Thx

Redamare · 08-09-2011, 02:52 AM

yeahh i haven't noticed any difference . . Rudd knows best though

leave it up to him to give the important info

dtacs · 08-09-2011, 03:57 AM

Its been on every night on NwA and I have no issues on the Alternate layer, get constant 100 fps. I would assume the Standard layer is no different since its less intensive.

I'm using CCC to bypass BF2's natural AA so that could make a difference.

H.Maverick · 08-09-2011, 08:43 AM

I don't notice any difference at all

dtacs · 08-09-2011, 11:53 AM

Just played a 3 hour round of Standard, absolutely no difference. In my opinion, chopper Basrah is a huge success.

Mj Pain · 08-09-2011, 04:05 PM

I have voted small decreace in performance.
Fps drops a bit but it is still playable.

Standard layout, looking towards the city from VCP, city not viewable = 90fps
Alt layout, looking towards the city from VCP, city viewable = 50fps

Standard layout, inside the city looking towards the hotel, hotel not viewable = 60fps
Alt layout, inside the city looking at the hotel, hotel viewable = 45 fps

All on local.

~~mattnett1~~ · 08-09-2011, 10:02 PM

Yes and no.

I did realize it though. I find i have more frag and less lag.

[R-DEV]Rudd · 08-09-2011, 10:03 PM

Quote:

Yes and no.

clear as mud, wanna clarify please?

~~mattnett1~~ · 08-09-2011, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by [R-DEV]Rudd

clear as mud, wanna clarify please?

I have a better performance.

View Poll Results: Please indicate your performance difference between levels (if any)
I have no performance difference between layers	42	62.69%
I have a small decrease in performance in layer 32 compared to 16/64	4	5.97%
I have a large decrease in performance in layer 32 compared to 16/64	0	0%
I have not played enough Al Basrah to compare	21	31.34%
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll

08-08-2011, 11:19 PM	#1
[R-DEV]Rudd PR:BF2 Developer Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 18,510 United Kingdom Location: Brighton Blog Entries: 2	[Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 64/16 Al basrah 32 has got an increased view distance to make choppers more practical We worried that the clients may have FPS troubles due to previous issues with Al Basrah. Please vote in the poll to give us a clear indication of how the different layers affected you. Any additional information can be posted below, any off topic posts will be extremely unwelcome. Thanks for your cooperation.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "We live for the one! We die for the one!"

08-09-2011, 12:31 AM	#2
Jolly Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 779 China Location: ChangSha（長沙）	Re: [Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 6 I have average FPS 45~50 in 32 al basrah as a infantry,i dont see any differences between 64 al basrah and i am using my laptop with NVIDIA G102M OPSYS Windows7,But the FPS will be 20 when i am driving a APC with smoke around...(thermal on) In a word no trouble running this map. But in Reality China Community,very few of them met Game Crash and low FPS,I'll post their report later. Thx

08-09-2011, 02:52 AM	#3
Redamare Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 1,589 United States of America Location: The Jerz	Re: [Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 6 yeahh i haven't noticed any difference . . Rudd knows best though leave it up to him to give the important info
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

08-09-2011, 03:57 AM	#4
dtacs Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 5,422 Australia Location: Sydney	Re: [Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 6 Its been on every night on NwA and I have no issues on the Alternate layer, get constant 100 fps. I would assume the Standard layer is no different since its less intensive. I'm using CCC to bypass BF2's natural AA so that could make a difference.

08-09-2011, 08:43 AM	#5
H.Maverick I wanna be a DEV! Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 422 Norway Location: Enebakk, A-hus	Re: [Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 6 I don't notice any difference at all

08-09-2011, 11:53 AM	#6
dtacs Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 5,422 Australia Location: Sydney	Re: [Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 6 Just played a 3 hour round of Standard, absolutely no difference. In my opinion, chopper Basrah is a huge success.

08-09-2011, 04:05 PM	#7
Mj Pain Join Date: May 2008 Posts: 870 Sweden Location: Strongside	Re: [Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 6 I have voted small decreace in performance. Fps drops a bit but it is still playable. Standard layout, looking towards the city from VCP, city not viewable = 90fps Alt layout, looking towards the city from VCP, city viewable = 50fps Standard layout, inside the city looking towards the hotel, hotel not viewable = 60fps Alt layout, inside the city looking at the hotel, hotel viewable = 45 fps All on local.
	To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 1 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. "Playing PR - Better drink my own piss." Ploddit

08-09-2011, 10:02 PM	#8
~~mattnett1~~ Banned Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 244 United States of America Location: Michigan	Re: [Poll]Do you have a significant performance difference between Al basrah 32 and 6 Yes and no. I did realize it though. I find i have more frag and less lag.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Sponsored Links